Currently Listening to: Eric Flowchild – Before it E.N.Ds
I’m gonna start by saying that I’m on season four of How I Met Your Mother. Yeah. 4 years of tv in one week. sweet.
Anyway, onto a more serious note; the Claremont Independent released its February 2009 edition… this week? I’m not sure of the issue’s exact release but this article was included in it attacking diversity groups and its apparent connection with failures in Academic Performance. This is closely linked to this article published in 2007,
The Claremont Independent, for those who are reading this from outside of the 5c community, is a 5C monthly newspaper written by students who “are unabashedly conservative and libertarian, but are not beholden to any party in particular.” For those who are Milton Academy students/Alumni, the editor is Charles Johnson ‘07.
I’m going to “preface” by saying that I have not yet read the studies cited within the article, I don’t actively study diversity and its psychological effects, or social identity. It’s sort of sad; I don’t have classes on social justice or anything on that issue and my schedule is currently packed… with Ted Mosby and his stories of finding his wife and the AWESOME Barnabus Stinson. Everything I write about is based upon personal experience or the few articles I chance upon.
I think the first thing that comes to mind is the link that Mr. Ilan Wurman tries to draw. The link is highly circumstansial and, quite frankly, ridiculous. I accept the fact that people could potentially be ostracized by diversity groups because it could be the first time that they’re confronted with such issues. You could also make the statement that joining a new community on a whole, like say… the 5C community, is a daunting experience and as time progresses the issue of race and social identity becomes a growing internal conflict and such diversity groups aren’t properly addressing such problems. My point is, there is no link. The article jumps from one observation and concludes something that seemingly jumps out of mid-air.
I’m going to link back to this, posting about the indifference of many students who join such diversity groups. There are two ways you can link that post to the article by Mr. Wurman. You can say that people like me, who are trying to actively discuss social and racial issues is the apparent “cause” of such academic problems. (It’s interesting. If I eat lunch with a couple of friends and talk about my race with another fellow member of said race, will my academic performance decrease as well?) Or you can look at it as this: some people see APAM or other diversity groups simply as a social group, and not a group about diversity or race. Which, if you ask most people, is what people see APAM as. It is a support mentor group for Asian students, while orientated around race, is not specific to race. We don’t actively meet with our mentor groups to talk about why race is effecting our lives. Hardly.
I can’t see the alternative world that the Independent tries to create. I struggle to imagine an instution with out diversity groups or even a venue to discuss social issues. It’s sort of a backwards idea. But as of right now, my goal for a 3.8 GPA is unattainable, because I’m attending Kollaboration in the 21st with a couple APAM members, and a diversity conference on the 28th. Aww shucks.